Esty v. Cummings
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Cant, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
Action in ejectment to recover possession of lot 3, East Third Street, Duluth Proper, First Division, in the city of Duluth, which plaintiff alleges is wrongfully withheld from him by the defendant, who is in the actual possession thereof.
The answer alleges that defendant’s husband has been the' owner of said lot for 16 years, that the same is, and during said 16 years has been, her homestead, that she has never released her right to such homestead, and that for many years she and her husband, with their children, have been living upon said lot as their homestead. The issues were tried by the…
2Cited by12 opinions
- In Re SholdanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Kangas v. RobieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- O'BRIEN v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- In Re OlsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
- Mickelson v. Anderson (In Re Anderson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.