Legal Opinion

Missouri, Kansas & Oklahoma Coach Lines v. Meister

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 1958No. 37940PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties to this appeal will be designated herein as in the trial court, although they appear here inversely to the order of their appearance there.

Prior to the institution of this action, plaintiff was charged by information in the Common Pleas Court of Tulsa County with the offense of embezzlement. Upon trial of that charge he was acquitted. Thereafter he filed this action and upon trial was awarded damages by a jury verdict upon which judgment against defendant was rendered. Defendant has appealed. The issue in this action involves the defense of “probable cause.”

Prior to June 16, 1954,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Williams v. FreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Duerksen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Towne v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Brown v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Michael Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation, D/B/A Target Stores, a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  2. Norton v. LiddelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Lewis v. Crystal Gas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Norton v. LiddelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Page v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API