Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dearborn Fire Fighters Union Local No 412, IAFF v. City of Dearborn

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 1972No. Docket 11306; Docket 11920PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1ConcurrenceO’Hara, J.

Judge Bronson and I agree with Judge Brennan in all respects except as to the necessity for further arbitrational proceedings.

The failure of the city to designate a member of the arbitration panel, does not affect the panel’s jurisdiction. Jurisdiction stems from the legislative *54grant over the subject matter. Whatever the effect of the presence or absence of the kind panel member might have been, it was the city’s doing that there were only two. Neither the city nor the union, were the situation reversed, can vitiate the arbitration procedure simply by inaction.

It would be quixotic, to say…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dearborn Fire Fighters Union Local No 412 v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of Detroit v. Detroit Police Officers Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Maryland Classified Employees Ass'n v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. City of Sioux Falls v. Sioux Falls Firefighters, Local 814South Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. City of Corning v. Corning Police DepartmentNew York Supreme Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API