Legal Opinion

Porter v. Selsky

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided August 29, 2003No. 6:95-mj-00598PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIN, District Judge.

Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (Item 85), plaintiffs cross-motion seeking to amend the complaint to add an additional defendant (Item 111), and plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of this court’s May 7, 1997 decision and order (Item 124). Oral argument of these motions was heard on July 7, 2003. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted, plaintiffs cross-motion to amend the complaint is denied, and plaintiffs motion for reconsideration is denied.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. Rosenblatt Securities Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. A'Gard v. PerezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Porter v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Porter v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Sklodowska-Grezak v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API