Craig v. Craig
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVINE, Judge.
¶ 1 The court has reviewed the appellate record filed in the above-captioned ease and has determined that both parties’ appeals must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
¶ 2 This court has an obligation to independently review its jurisdiction. Engel v. Landman, 221 Ariz. 504, 508, ¶ 10, 212 P.3d 842, 846 (App.2009). In Barassi v. Matison, the Arizona Supreme Court held that a notice of appeal filed after the denial of a motion for new trial but before entry of a final judgment provides a basis for appellate jurisdiction. 130 Ariz. 418, 419-22, 636 P.2d 1200, 1201-04…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Baumann v. TutonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Performance Funding, LLC v. Barcon Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
3Cited by3 opinions
- Craig v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- Fields v. OatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Craig v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010