Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Grigsby

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 28, 2008No. 20060481-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

T1 Gina M. Arnold and Charlie S. Arnold appeal the trial court's summary judgment order in favor of David Grigsby, M.D., which concluded that the Arnolds' claims were time-barred by the Utah Health Care Malpractice Act's two-year statute of limitations. See Utah Code Ann. $ 78-14-4(1) (2002). By reason of the generally applicable tolling statute, which suspends the running of a statute of limitations when a defendant departs from Utah after a cause of action has accrued against him, see id. § 78-12-85, we reverse.

BACKGROUND 1

T2 On July 22, 1999, Dr. Gary White performed a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Russell Packard Development, Inc. v. CarsonUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Carrier v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Doit, Inc. v. Touche, Ross & Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Spears v. WarrUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Snyder v. CluneUtah Supreme Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arnold v. GrigsbyUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Arnold v. GrigsbyUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Arnold v. GrigsbyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  4. Arnold v. GrigsbyUtah Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API