Legal Opinion

McMahen v. McMahen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1898No. Appeal, No. 278PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal, No. 278, Jan. T., 1897, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Mareb T., 1894, No. 54, sustaining exceptions to master’s report in divorce. Libel for divorce. Tbe facts appear by the opinion of tbe Supreme Court. Error assigned was decree of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Gbeen,

While it is to be much regretted that the learned court below filed no opinion in this case setting forth its reasons for disagreeing with the master as to his conclusions, the view we take of the testimony and its legal effect renders the solution of the controversy a comparatively easy task.

As to the acts of cruelty complained of by the wife, there is no very serious difference between her testimony and her husband’s. She specifies them all in detail, and includes personal violence on his part in every instance. He admits them all, including the personal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. May v. MaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  2. Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  3. Mayhew v. MayhewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  4. Canfield v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Church v. ClappMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Breene v. BreeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Fay v. FaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Howe v. HoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Huston v. HustonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Schulze v. SchulzeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API