Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Ground

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 5, 1924PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

The ,plaintiff in this suit complains of certain wrongs done him by the defendants, and asked various kinds of relief. A demurrer to his amended petition was sustained by the trial court. He declined to plead further, and judgment was rendered against him, from which judgment he appealed.

Plaintiff’s amended petition alleges the following:

“Plaitiff brings this suit on behalf of himself, and such other stockholders of the Porto Rico Mining Com pany, as may be similarly situated, and who may wish to join herein.
“Plaintiff avers that the Porto Eico Mining Company is a corporation, organized under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Minneapolis, Red Lake & Manitoba Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Lash v. ChristieNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Whittingham v. DarrinNew York Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Willcox v. Harriman Securities CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1933
  2. Wear v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Wollums Ex Rel. Wollums v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Mitchell v. Health Culture CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Leimkuehler v. WessendorfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API