Legal Opinion

Whittingham v. Darrin

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by plaintiff against defendant Darrin, demanding a judgment annulling an alleged copartnership agreement and dissolving the copartnership. Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

The plaintiff claims in this action that a copartnership exists between himself and the defendant Darrin in relation to the stock of the defendant, the Automatic Switch Company, and he demands a judgment annulling the alleged copartnership agreement and dissolving the copartnership. As incidental relief the plaintiff seeks a further judgment directing that the assets of the copartnership, consisting of said corporate stock, be sold and an accounting had between the plaintiff and defendant Darrin of all their transactions; that an injunction issue restraining the several defendants from…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barnett v. GroundSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API