Mayer v. L&B REAL ESTATE
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
Frank and Josie Mayer brought an action to quiet title after they learned that a small portion of a piece of commercial property they owned had been sold at a tax sale. The trial court ruled that the Mayers had not been given adequate notice of the tax delinquency and tax sale, but the Court of Appeal reversed the resulting judgment, ruling that the Mayers’ action was barred by the statute of limitations because they “had constructive and actual notice of the tax sale, providing them with ample time to comply with the one-year limitations period.” We disagree. The Mayers were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tannhauser v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Muktarian v. BarmbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Sears v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- McCaslin v. HamblenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Smith v. MatthewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Salazar v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- BERBERICH VS. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
- Bangerter v. PettyUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. UP Ventures II, LLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.