Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Kaemmerer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1926Published

1Opinion of the Court

* Corpus Juris-Cyc. References: Constitutional Law, 12CJ, p. 787, n. 96; p. 790, n. 2, 3; Costs, 15 CJ, p. 252, n. 74 New; Fraudulent Conveyances, 27CJ, p. 875, n. 27; p. 879, n. 87, 88, 91, 92; p. 880, n. 6; p. 887, n. 97 New, 98 New, 2 New. This is an action to recover $500 damages for breach of contract. The action was commenced in a justice court in the city of St. Louis. From the justice court the case went to the circuit court on appeal. Upon a trial anew in the circuit court, without a jury, judgment was given in favor of plaintiff for $100, and the defendant appeals.

There is no…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McKinster v. SagerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People's Savings Bank v. Van AllsburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Joplin Supply Co. v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Eklund v. HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API