Eklund v. Hopkins
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Belt, T., entered May 4, 1903, upon setting aside the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants by direction of the court and granting a new trial, in an action of claim and delivery for goods levied upon.
1Opinion of the Court
Mount, J. —
In March, 1903, one Ernest Eklund was conducting a second hand store in Spokane. On the 26th day of March he sold his business, and the whole of the goods, wares, and merchandise in -stock, to respondents, without attempting to. comply with the act of 1901 relating to the sale and transfer of goods, wares, and merchandise in bulk. At that time Ernest Eklund was indebted to appellant Hopkins for services as an attorney at law. After the sale, Hopkins obtained a judgment against Ernest Eklund in the justice court. An execution was issued upon this judgment, and placed in the hands of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McDaniels v. J. J. Connelly Shoe Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by13 opinions
- Escalle v. MarkNevada Supreme Court · 1919
- Thorpe v. Pennock Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Brinson v. Monroe Automobile & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Burnett v. TrimmellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Hartwig v. RushingOregon Supreme Court · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.