Legal Opinion

Harmar Coal Co. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1977No. Appeal, No. 2319 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Harmar Coal Company and Old Republic Companies have appealed from a decision of the Work*100men’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee’s order awarding workmen’s compensation benefits to the claimant, Clara E. Ruskus. The Board additionally directed the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Harmar Coal Company and Old Republic Companies proportionately to pay to Clara E. Ruskus $100.00, that being the charge made by her doctor witness for testifying.1

The claimant is the widow of Joseph Anthony Ruskus. Mr. Ruskus retired on October 13, 1973 after having worked for 39…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Garden Coal Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. J. R. Sales, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Cavanaugh v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Volterano v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. DeGuffroy & Associates, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. McGowan v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API