DeGuffroy & Associates, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Senior Judge Kalish,
The claimant, Catherine C. Bianchetti, was the dependent mother of the deceased. The petitioner, De-Guffroy and Associates, Inc., filed a modification petition, contending that the claimant’s status had changed, in that her income exceeded her expenses and,' therefore, benefits should be terminated. The petitioner also contends that since there was a reasonable basis for filing the modification petition, attorney’s fees should not have been awarded to the claimant.
The Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirmed the action of the referee in continuing the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harmar Coal Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Gunther v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Kreider v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chuckwagon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Claws Refuse, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Chuckwagon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987