Legal Opinion

Jones v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 23, 1925No. 27PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating tho facts as above).

Tho scope or legal content of the “pier end statute” has been fully set forth in The Amanda Moore, 257 F. 405, 168 C. C. A. 445, and a little more recently in The Daniel B. Flannery (C. C. A.) 282 F. 545. So far as the meaning of the statute is concerned, we have nothing to add to these eases; but this litigation raises tho point (novel so far as wo know) whether the City Charter can regulate, or practical*392ly penalize, the, place necessarily occupied by a dredge working for the Unite'd States in aid, of the sovereign’s prerogative of regulating and aiding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Eli B. ConineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  2. The New York Central No. 18Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  3. Flannery v. National Coal & Ice Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. the SS BeatriceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  2. Holcomb v. The Adam E. CorneliusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  3. Transpacific Carriers Corp. v. Tug Ellen F. McAllisterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API