Legal Opinion

Burden v. J. C. Cross & Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Fannin. Tried below before the Hon. Hardin Hart. The judgment was by default.

1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.

The defendants in error obtained judgment in the district court against the plaintiff in error, on a promissory note executed by J. O. White as principal, and A. J. Burden as security, on which judgment Burden sued out a writ of error, and now asks a revision by ths court on account of errors claimed to have been committed in the court below.

There are two errors specified in the assignment fatal to the judgment of the district court, for which it must be reversed. The plaintiffs in the district court sued in their partnership name, without setting out the names of the persons composing the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frank v. TatumTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Ives v. MuhlenburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  3. Luse v. Fort Worth Electric & Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Wills v. TyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API