Legal Opinion

Roger v. Whitham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1909No. 8323PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of file superior court for King county, Main, J., entered June 30, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to set aside a foreclosure sale and to quiet title, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

On the 9th day of December, 1902, plaintiffs acquired the fee simple title to lot 33, block 74, Gilman *191Park, now a part of the city of Seattle, but.at all the times hereinafter mentioned a part of the city of Ballard, in King county. In December, 1902, the city council of the city of Ballard passed an ordinance declaring its intention to construct a sewer on Ballard avenue, and such subsequent proceedings were had that an assessment of $56.90 was levied against the property. The ordinance provided that all assessments should be paid in one payment, and within a limited time, to the treasurer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Ballentyne v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. West v. WaddillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  4. Clute v. BarronMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Wright v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Miebach v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Udall v. TD Escrow Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Udall v. T.D. Escrow Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Gray v. ReevesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Charles v. Roxana Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API