Wood v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
DoNXON, Judge:
The issue here is whether certain acoustical mineral tile, imported in 1960 from Canada, was correctly classified by the collector as earthy or mineral substances, manufactured, decorated, under paragraph 214, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), with duty as such at the rate of 34 per centum. Plaintiff’s protest claims that these tiles should be classified under that same paragraph, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), as earthy or mineral…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bunker Hill Brick & Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Koscherak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
- Otagiri Mercantile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- United States v. Mutual China Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. Todd & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.