W.R. Grace & Co. v. Department of Revenue
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.
This is our sixth,1 and hopefully final, decision in the recent round of cases on the constitutionality of Washington’s Business and Occupation (B&O) tax on interstate manufacturers and sellers. Yet again, we are asked if the United States Supreme Court opinion in Tyler Pipe applies retroactively and, if so, what remedies are available to taxpayers who paid B&O taxes under the unconstitutional tax scheme identified by the United States Supreme Court in that decision, particularly for those periods prior to June 23, 1987, the date of the issuance of the Court’s opinion. Tyler Pipe Indus., Inc.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Hambleton v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Perlstein v. WolkIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Oltman v. Holland America Line USA, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Oltman v. Holland America Line USA, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.