Gorman v. Carr
Superior Court of Delaware
Action of Assumpsit to recover for personal services which plaintiff claimed she rendered the defendant as bar-keeper, and other work about his house, from December 25, 1896 to June 30th, 1907—542 weeks at ten dollars a week.
1Opinion of the Court
Lore, C. J.,
charging the jury:
Gentlemen of the jury:—This is an action brought by Bridget *293Gorman, the plaintiff against Bernard Carr, the defendant, in assumpsit to recover for her personal services which she claims she rendered the defendant as bar-keeper and other work about his home from December 25th, 1896 to June 30th, 1907, claiming for 542 weeks at ten dollars a week, amounting, according to her claim, to $5420.00, with interest from June 30th of the present year; for this amount she seeks to recover a verdict in this case.
The defendant claims that the plaintiff entered his house as…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Marcus v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Hanson v. Chicago B. Q.R.R. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Boling v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1932
- Grandillo v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932
- King v. Wynema Council No. 10Superior Court of Delaware · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.