Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Chicago B. Q.R.R. Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1925No. 1072PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BiNER, District Judge.

This is an action to recover benefits which appellant, Walter Hanson, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, alleges he is entitled to under the rules and regulations of the Belief Department of the respondent, Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, hereinafter mentioned as the defendant. The purpose of the Department was to establish and manage a relief fund for the payment of definite amounts to employes of defendant contributing thereto when under the regulations of the Department they were entitled to such payments by reason of disability, or in the event…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Byers & Davis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  3. Supreme Council of the Order of Chosen Friends v. ForsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. State ex rel. Hughes v. MilhollanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Supreme Council of Order of Chosen Friends v. GarrigusIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Brown v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. FrontczakMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API