Legal Opinion
Skeen v. Denver Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (In Re Feyline Presents, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 4, 1988No. 16-13409PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CHARLES E. MATHESON, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the Defendant Denver Coca-Cola Bottling Company (“Coke”) and the Plaintiff Matthew D. Skeen, as the Trustee and successor-in-interest to the Debtor Feyline Presents, Inc. (“Feyline”) in the above adversary proceeding.
The Trustee herein filed his First Amended Complaint on April 20, 1987. In that Complaint he alleged that Feyline and Coke entered into an agreement in December, 1982, under which Coke was to pay a fee and Feyline was to provide…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Cochise College Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- David W. CAREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re National Steel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Carrico v. Tompkins (In Re Tompkins)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re El Paso Refinery, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1998
- In Re Enron Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Goldin v. Putnam Lovell, Inc. (In Re Monarch Capital Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.