Legal Opinion
David W. CAREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1987No. 85-2894PublishedCited by 191 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant appeals the dismissal of his claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, based upon racial discrimination in employment. The district court granted defendant-appellee’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that the appellee had articulated a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its conduct, and appellant did not raise a sufficient factual issue as to whether that reason was a mere pretext for impermissible discrimination. We affirm.
For some time prior to 1978, appellant, a white male, and Mr. Omar Nix, a black…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLASHER COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Marilyn Wheeler v. Main HurdmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Drake v. City of Fort CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Alexander Shapolia v. Los Alamos National Laboratory, and John WhettenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.