Legal Opinion

People v. Byrd

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 2011No. D056974PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, Acting P. J.

Aaron Wade Byrd contends the trial court erred when it sentenced him to prison for forcible sodomy (Pen. Code;1 § 286, subd. (c)(2); count 3) with a fixed-term enhancement for aggravated kidnapping for purposes of committing the crime (§ 667.61, subd. (d)(2)), but refused to stay his sentence for simple kidnapping (§ 207; count 1) because, *92Byrd contends, he committed the sodomy during the same kidnapping. Byrd also contends his case should be remanded for resentencing because the trial court did not recognize it had discretion to impose concurrent, as opposed to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. MassieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. DelozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. ManceboCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People v. Adams, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. People v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API