Legal Opinion

Texas Electric Ry. v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1924No. 66. [fn*]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

This is the third appeal of this cause. See 210 S. W. 749, 231 S. W. 823, and (Tex. Com. App.) 243 S. W. 980. Appellee in substance alleged that, while working for appellant as a section hand under one Gibson as foreman, said foreman ordered him and other employees to push a motor car along the track for the purpose of causing the gasoline to ignite and start the engine to propel it; that after the engine started it was then his duty to jump onto said car; that the motor car had no handholds on same, and when he attempted to jump on the car the said foreman, who was operating and controlling…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gulf, Texas & Western Railway Co. v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. WadsackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Interstate Casualty Co. of Birmingham v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. StuartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Pullman Co. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Austin v. De GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Bankers Lloyds v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Continental Ins. Co. of New York v. NaborsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Miller v. PettigrewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API