Legal Opinion
Rohlf v. Great American Mutual Indemnity Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 14, 1927PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
The plaintiff was injured on August 6, 1922, in a collision between two automobiles, while he was riding as a guest with his friend, A. C. Chapman, in Chapman’s car. Chapman held indemnity insurance in the defendant company pro tecting him from such liability as was within the terms of the policy. Thereafter Rohlf brought an action against Chapman for the injuries suffered, and recovered a verdict and judgment of $1,500. The judgment not being satisfied, he brought this action against the company on the indemnity policy issued by it. A jury being waived, the case was tried to the court, a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Schoenfeld v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Oakland Motor Co. v. American Fidelity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Bassi v. BassiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by23 opinions
- Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Finkle v. Western Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Eakle v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Slavens v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.