Pollock Paper Corp. v. Klebold

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. (a) The court did not err in overruling the garnishee’s motion for a new trial on the general grounds or in overruling its motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The principal contention of the plaintiff in error is that under the provisions of Code § 8-502 the trial court did not have jurisdiction to subject the wages of the defendant to the process of garnishment. It contends that the proviso in Code § 8-502 is not a personal exemption such as the one contained in *655Code Ann. § 46-208. This position on the part of the plaintiff in error is untenable. For the…