Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wood

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1940No. 12984PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. Since the motion for new trial did not complain of the direction of the verdict, and exceptions to such ruling were taken only in the bill of exceptions, which was tendered for certification more than 30 days after the adjournment of the term at which such ruling was made, the exceptions were presented too late to authorize any decision thereon by this court. Code, §§ 6-902, 6-905; Alley v. Candler, 155 Ga. 739 (3) (118 S. E. 354) ; Collins v. Collins, 168 Ga. 269 (147 S. E. 567); Ryals v. Atlantia Life Insurance Co., 184 Ga. 556 (2) (192 S. E. 38) ; Carr v. Morris, 17 Ga.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sinclair Refining Co. v. GiddensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Mendel v. Converse & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Berry v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Shockley v. StoreySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Braswell v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Ballard v. HarmonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Williams v. CrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Wright v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API