Legal Opinion

Hannah v. Hannah

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 13, 1940No. 13336PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beid, Chief Justice.

The question presented is whether “benefit payments” made and to be made to the plaintiff in error by the United States Government by reason of the death of a son by his first wife while in military service during the world war, and property purchased with such “benefit payments,” can properly be considered by the judge as available resources of the plaintiff in error, -in awarding his second wife temporary alimony. The plaintiff in error is seventy-nine years of age, and physically unable to work. He is paid $45 per month by the United States Government, and out of these…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Trotter v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Lawrence v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. McIntosh v. AubreySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Carrier v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cartledge v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  2. Krokyn v. KrokynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Bagnall v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  4. Ogle v. HeimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Ward v. WardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API