Legal Opinion

Decker v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 1989No. A8711-06989; CA A48881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

Plaintiffs are two former sergeants in the Portland Police Bureau who were dismissed in November, 1987, on grounds that included their alleged purchase and use of cocaine over a period of years. In this civil action, they claim that the terminations violated their rights under the Oregon and United States Constitutions. They seek reinstatement, back pay and attorney fees under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution1 and under 42 USC § 1983. Defendants are the City of Portland and its mayor, who was also the Police Commissioner. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendants…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. SorianoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Rogers v. SaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. SorianoOregon Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ettner v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Ettner v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Ettner v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API