Legal Opinion

Ettner v. City of Medford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 5, 1998No. 96-2123-L-3; CA A98376Published

1Opinion of the Court

963 P.2d 149 (1998)

155 Or. App. 435

Kristen A. ETTNER, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF MEDFORD, a municipal corporation, Respondent.

96-2123-L-3; CA A98376.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted February 17, 1998.

Decided August 5, 1998.

Lee S. Werdell, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Werdell & Hanson.

Kimberlee C. Morrow, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Matt Farmer and Law Office of Robert E. Franz, Jr.

Before De MUNIZ, P.J., and HASELTON and LINDER, JJ.

HASELTON, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals, assigning error to the allowance of summary…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Koch v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Ettner v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Koch v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Decker v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API