Ettner v. City of Medford
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
963 P.2d 149 (1998)
155 Or. App. 435
Kristen A. ETTNER, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF MEDFORD, a municipal corporation, Respondent.
96-2123-L-3; CA A98376.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted February 17, 1998.
Decided August 5, 1998.
Lee S. Werdell, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Werdell & Hanson.
Kimberlee C. Morrow, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Matt Farmer and Law Office of Robert E. Franz, Jr.
Before De MUNIZ, P.J., and HASELTON and LINDER, JJ.
HASELTON, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals, assigning error to the allowance of summary…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Koch v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Ettner v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Koch v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Decker v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.