Legal Opinion

Winkle v. Edison Learning, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 6, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00242Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON Mark Winkle, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 3:19-cv-242 Judge Thomas M. Rose EdisonLearning, Inc., Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT EDISONLEARNING’S MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT, ECF 8. PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS OF RETALIATION AND VIOLATION OF OHIO PUBLIC POLICY ARE DISMISSED. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, THE MOTION IS DENIED. ______________________________________________________________________________…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API