Legal Opinion
Biosite, Inc. v. Xoma Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 25, 2001No. C-01-2251-PJH, C-01-2580-PJHPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Defendants’ motions to dismiss the above-entitled related actions came on for hearing on September 12, 2001, before this court, the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton presiding. Biosite, Inc., appeared by its counsel Kirk M. Hasson and Sharon L. O’Grady, and XOMA Ltd., XOMA (Bermuda) Ltd., XOMA Ireland Ltd. and XOMA Corporation appeared by their counsel Charles A. Gilman and Matthew B. Lehr. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Amari v. Radio Spirits, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Novartis Pharma AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020