Legal Opinion

Fosillo v. Matthews

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Macken, J.

In this action, tried before the court without a jury, the parties stipulated that the court determine the issues of liability only and further stipulated as to the amount of damages to be paid in the event plaintiff is found entitled to recover in either or both of the alleged causes of action.

On April 3, 1964 plaintiff’s intestate was a passenger in an automobile owned by the defendant Mary Matthews and being operated by the defendant Raffaella Matthews on the New York State Thruway. All of the parties were residents of the State of Massachusetts and the car was registered in Massachusetts.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Gypsum Co. v. Biley-Stoker Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. In re the Estate of BonesteelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
  3. Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. BuscemiNew York Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bray v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. Rye v. KolterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API