Legal Opinion

Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. Buscemi

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

In this mortgage foreclosure action, judgment of foreclosure in the form submitted by plaintiff has been signed by the court notwithstanding the objections of the United States. The first objection is that the judgment held by the United States and which derives from an FHA insured loan has not been accorded priority, but the decision of the Appellate Division, Second Department in Dime Sav. Bank v. Beecher (23 A D 2d 297, app. dsmd. 17 N Y 2d 725, mot. for rearg. den. 17 N Y 2d 813) determines that issue against the Government’s contention.

The second objection is that the judgment does not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Buffalo Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fosillo v. MatthewsNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API