Legal Opinion
Sinkfield v. Pope
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided December 15, 1983No. 83-2246C(1)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
578 F.Supp. 1500 (1983)
George SINKFIELD, Plaintiff,
v.
Charles E. POPE, Defendant.
No. 83-2246C(1).
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.
December 15, 1983.
E. Thomas Clarkin, Gray, Stewart & Clarkin, Clayton, Mo., for plaintiff.
Joseph B. Moore, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM
NANGLE, Chief Judge.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss be and is granted and plaintiff's complaint be and is dismissed. This is an action for damages arising out of an automobile accident between plaintiff's automobile and defendant's U.S. Postal Service…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Yedwab v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stokes v. U.S. Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- De Casenave v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
- Anderson v. Heartland Coca-ColaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- Anderson v. Heartland Coca-ColaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- Earl E. Wright v. T.R. Young, Warden, Earl E. Wright v. Tony R. Young, Warden Patrick Casey, Associate Warden J.B. Hurt, S.I.S. Officer H.H. Engelage, Acting Captain J.S. Payne, Case Manager and Mr. Franco, Safety ManagerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987