Legal Opinion

Yedwab v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 29, 1980No. Civ. 79-3650PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIUNNO, District Judge.

Doris Yedwab claims she was injured May 31, 1978 in a fall at a U.S. Postal Service postoffice. She and her husband now sue under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. She claims for her injuries, her husband Seymour sues per quod.

Suit was begun against the “U.S. Postal Service”. This is the wrong party, and the United States is ordered substituted as defendant. Also, the complaint has a jury demand, but the demand must be stricken since jury trial is not available under the Act.

This leaves the key issue raised on motion by the United States: did…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bledsoe v. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1974

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Merriweather v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. Austin Vernell, Acting for and on Behalf of the Community Estate and Helen Vernell, Individually v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Violet M. Maahs, and Alfred J. Maahs, Her Husband v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Virginia McDuffee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. Merriweather v. City Of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API