Legal Opinion

Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 21, 2009No. 2008-1248PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellees ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. filed a petition for rehearing en banc. The petition for rehearing en banc was presumed to request relief that can be granted by the panel that heard the appeal, and action on the petition for rehearing en banc was deferred until the panel had an opportunity to grant the relief requested. The panel requested a response from Defendant-Appellant Eli Lilly and Company, who filed a response. The court granted Novozymes A/S’s motion for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae.

The petition for rehearing was considered by the panel that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N v. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Optium Corp. v. Emcore Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  3. Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  4. Eli Lilly and Co. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USADistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2009
  5. Optium Corp. v. Emcore Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API