Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Oklahoma City University

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 28, 2014No. 12-6323PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT **

CARLOS F. LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Dr. Anna Hamilton was teaching part-time at Oklahoma City University (“OCU”) when a full-time, tenure-track faculty position became available in its philosophy department. She applied, gave several interviews, and made the shortlist of finalists. OCU ultimately hired someone else — a man Hamilton says was unqualified for the job. She sued OCU, alleging the university had discriminated against her on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”).

OCU defended its hiring decision…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Bones v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. Kendrick v. Penske Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Fort Hays State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
  2. Brown v. Colorado Judicial DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
  3. Jenny v. L3 TechnologiesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024
  4. Jiang v. City of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2026
  5. Kincaid v. USD 500 Kansas City, KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API