Legal Opinion

Brooks Equipment & Manufacturing Co. v. Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1949PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

When the plaintiff had completed its evidence counsel demurred to defendant’s pleading which set up his further defense and counterclaim, on the ground that fraud ivas not sufficiently alleged. The court reserved its judgment on the demurrer pending further proceedings. These consisted of a preview in the absence of the jury of the evidence the 'defendant intended to offer in support of his defense and counterclaim. It can readily be seen that the defendant’s evidence had no relevancy to the demurrer, which was to the pleading. At the conclusion of this hearing defendant was advised by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Iron & Equipment Co. v. Bamberg, E. & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Brown v. Constant GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1858

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Hunter v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Becker v. Graber Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Setzer v. OLD REPUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Brooks v. Ervin Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API