Legal Opinion

Mattix v. Maurice River Township

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 12, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Unless there be some technicality upon which prosecutor as a matter of strict right is entitled to prevail the court finds no merit in the matters brought up by the writ; and before we proceed to scrutinize the record for technicalities helpful to the prosecutor it may be further observed that if the printed state of case placed in our hands is correct, the writ was neither allowed, signed nor sealed, and the affidavits upon which the writ is presumed to have issued were neither signed nor sworn to. These inaccuracies, if such they be, in the printed book can scarcely be attributed to speed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosen v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  2. Fort v. City of Gloucester CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bayonne v. FerencziNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API