Legal Opinion

Fort v. City of Gloucester City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 5, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBoduste, J.

Prosecutor seeks to have' certain tax sales held in' 1931 by the city of Gloucester set aside. In ease No. 270/271 property described as Water street, block 124, lot 1, was sold to the municipality. In case 272/273, the property sold to the city was described as Water street, block 120, lot 1-A and block 116, lot 1-D. In case 274/275, the property was described as Water street, block 127, lots 1-2 to 31. A trustee and an 'estate being interested, there were separate rules in each ease. These rules were consolidated into the three cases before us.

The properties were not on Water street and did…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mattix v. Maurice River TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API