Legal Opinion

Bayonne v. Ferenczi

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 28, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

49 N.J. Super. 100 (1958)

139 A.2d 315

CITY OF BAYONNE, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

STEPHEN M. FERENCZI, ET AL., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 17, 1958.

Decided February 28, 1958.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Stephen M. Ferenczi argued the cause pro se.

Mr. Frank J. Ziobro, attorney for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Gerald T. Grenert on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

This appeal is from a final judgment entered in the Superior Court, Chancery Division, foreclosing defendant's right of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Linden v. GleffiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Community Development Co., Inc. v. Seaside Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. Hinchliffe v. LoughlinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  4. Hinchliffe v. LoughlinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  5. Mattix v. Maurice River TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kahn Pension Plan v. Moorestown Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  2. Landa v. AdamsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. Town of West Orange v. BLOCK 107New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API