Legal Opinion
Ray v. Dyer
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 18, 1929No. 3256PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, O. J.
The appellees, R. L. Dyer find his wife, B. Ray, Farrell Ray, and Dr. Massie to recover damages alleged to have resulted to plaintiffs by reason of the unlawful acts of defendants, their employees and agents, in ejecting plaintiffs from a certain house occupied by plaintiffs as their home. Plaintiffs alleged, in sub stance, that they entered into'the occupancy of said house and premises with the consent of defendants, and were lawfully possessed thereof on the 17th day of July, 1928; that the defendants, acting through Farrell Ray, did unlawfully, willfully, and by force of arms…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mackenzie v. MinisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Iron Mountain & Helena Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Dustin v. CowdrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
- McFaddin, Wiess & Kyle Land Co. v. Texas Rice Land Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Sinclair v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hogenson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Daluiso v. BooneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Kent v. National Supply Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Saikin v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Johnson v. FongNevada Supreme Court · 1944