Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Nolan

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 5, 1977No. Patent Appeal No. 76-672PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejection under 35 USC 103 of claims 1 through 9, all of the claims in application serial No. 396,337, filed September 11, 1973, for “Multiple Gas Discharge Display/Memory Panel and Method of Operating.” We affirm.

The Invention

The invention is an improvement in a gaseous discharge display/memory device having an electrical memory and the capability of producing a visual display and the method of operating same. The improvement resides in the specific ionizable gaseous…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Application of Richard E. Warner and Virginia Ann WarnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Application of Rene De Montmollin and Henri RiatCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. In re MurchCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. In re SkollCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  5. In re SimonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re MayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  2. In re GreenfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  3. In Re Eli Lilly & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. GRACEWAY PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC v. Perrigo Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
  5. In re MagerleinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API