In re Magerlein
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Appeals (“board”) affirming the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 27-41. We reverse.
Background
Employing the synthesizing methods of the prior art (hereinafter “Corey”),1 appellant has synthesized C-16 dimethyl homo-*368logs of natural prostaglandins.2 Appellant’s synthesis uses chemical intermediates which are dimethyl homologs of the Corey intermediates. These intermediates are the subject matter of the claims on appeal.3 The Corey intermediates are productive of pharmaceutically useful…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- In re MayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Commissioner of Patents v. Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals RoesslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Application of Alan B. HuellmantelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Carl D. LunsfordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Jean Pierre Lalu and Louis FoulletierCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In re ClemensCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- United States v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Wilfredo Segarra Miranda, as trustee for the estate of José Rovira Santiago v. Banco de Desarollo Economico Para Puerto Rico, Marjorie Rivera Pugh, Rachael Stewart Collazo and RS Gift Sales Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008