Legal Opinion
Woodcock v. Udell
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided June 5, 1953No. 97 and 88PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Caret, J.:
These cases arose out of the same transaction and have been consolidated for present purposes. A recital of the facts is necessarily somewhat lengthy, although the area of dispute concerning them is rather small. The pleadings, depositions, affidavits and answers to interrogatories furnish the basis for the present motions.
Woodcock is a real estate agent who frequently sells property by way of public auction. Jacob and Leah Udell are husband and wife. At all times pertinent hereto, the two of them owned all the stock of Pine Forest Corporation. They likewise owned all the stock of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Coca Cola Co. v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934
- Shriner v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Frank C. Sparks Co. v. Huber Baking Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance v. BoyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. City of DoverSuperior Court of Delaware · 1977
- Allstate Auto Leasing Co. v. CaldwellSuperior Court of Delaware · 1978
- Rochester v. KatalanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Elmer v. Tenneco Resins, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- Colish v. Brandywine Raceway AssociationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.