Legal Opinion

Mekhi Johnson and Amber Garrity v. Agent Benjamin Hitesman, in his individual capacity under color of law

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 2026No. 4:25-cv-01422Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEKHI JOHNSON and No. 4:25-CV-01422 AMBER GARRITY, (Chief Judge Brann) Plaintiffs, v. AGENT BENJAMIN HITESMAN, in his individual capacity under color of law, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION APRIL 16, 2026 I. BACKGROUND On December 17, 2025, Plaintiffs Mekhi Johnson (“Johnson”) and Amber Garrity (“Garrity”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a seven-count Amended Complaint against Defendant Agent Benjamin Hitesman (“Defendant”).1 On December 24, 2025, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API