Legal Opinion

State v. Coleman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1967No. 264PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.

The State’s evidence in summary tends to show the following facts: Prior to 5 December 1965 there had been in Charlotte a number of telephone calls from a man or men in response to legitimate ads in the daily papers when it was apparent that a woman would answer. Typical of these ads were an ad, “girl to share an apartment with a girl,” or “some woman had a room for rent,” or “wearing apparel or something of that nature.” The police department of the city of Charlotte, in order to catch the man or men who made such calls, had the Charlotte Observer on Sunday, 5 December 1965, to .run the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. State v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. State v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Ralph B. Carnes and Roger W. Smallwood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. StatenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API