Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Beard-Laney, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 10, 1945No. 15772PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Associate Justice StukES

delivered the majority Opinion of the Court.

I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the ChiEE Justice for I think the case was properly submitted to the jury and this Court' should not undertake to decide it on the facts. And I do not think that the proposed decision to the contrary is required by the authority of the cited cases from this Court.

Knight v. Laurens Motor Car Co., 108 S. C., 179, 93 S. E., 869, L. R. A., 1918-B, 151, involved facts quite different. There an employee of an automobile garage took a car ouafter business hours (he had the keys) and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crowell v. DuncanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  2. Davis v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  3. Holder v. HaynesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Kohlman v. HylandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Altman v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nannette B. Davis v. Usx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  2. Mack v. Post ExchangeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  3. Thatcher v. Austin (In Re Austin)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1984
  4. Stevens v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. Natco Corporation v. MallorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API